View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Cuparman
Joined: 12 Jul 2008 Posts: 1873 Location: Irvine
|
Posted: Thu Aug 24, 2023 2:50 pm Post subject: This seasons new rules which many will have seen on sky. |
|
|
Are these new rules which we see regularly enforced on TV / sky EPL world wide.
Personally I hope so. Methinks most would agree that stealing yards, kicking the ball away,feigning injuries, what is oft referred to as the “ black arts”.....the list goes on.
We are at a win at all costs mentality and screw the “ sport” side of the game.
I am all for enforcing the new rules should they apply to us as long as the Refs are all consistent......not easy with no var. however possibly the 4th official can help out referees.
I really like the adding on of time for time wasting.
Coaching should be about increasing skill levels, not how to get away with cheating.
My tin hat is on. _________________ Born a Rover Live a Rover Die a Rover |
|
Back to top |
|
|
StarksBarmy
Joined: 03 Apr 2010 Posts: 4025
|
Posted: Thu Aug 24, 2023 3:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Makes plenty sense.
Is it actually in force in our league where we usually don’t have a 4th official? If it’s just at the referee’s discretion then we won’t know if we are looking at 5mins extra or 15!
Watching the English Football on TV last couple of weeks, it will be interesting to see if referee’s stick to what they are doing, if so, they will need plenty bottle as situations will arise when a red card needs to be dished out for what was happening dozens of times a game last year…. delaying the taking of a free kick is one, kicking the ball slightly back or standing over the ball as your team retreats back into position is meant to be an automatic yellow.
On a side note, I was interested to read that the 6 second rule for goalkeepers still exist where if they don’t release the ball from hands within the 6 seconds then an indirect free kick is awarded against them…. I presume referee’s choose just to ignore this one? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Heilan Rover
Joined: 24 Dec 2018 Posts: 600 Location: Lorient
|
Posted: Thu Aug 24, 2023 4:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
100% Agree Cuparman.
The Game is definitely gradually being destroyed with what is effectively "CHEATING".
I am old enough to remember when these arts were only practiced by South American teams. This was then followed by European teams, and then sadly us.
Alas. The beautiful game no more I fear?
Make room in your bunker for one more Cuparman. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
embow Moderator
Joined: 05 Jul 2008 Posts: 13026 Location: Lybster: O'er 'e Ord and far frae Fife
|
Posted: Thu Aug 24, 2023 5:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Build a bigger bunker guys because I'm coming in to join all of you with a similar opinion.👍 _________________ Talk on! Talk on!
You'll never talk alone.
🥹🤜🤛 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
wellyboot
Joined: 14 Jul 2008 Posts: 2567 Location: Aberdeenshire
|
Posted: Thu Aug 24, 2023 8:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It’s the claiming for fouls or throws when it clearly isn’t annoys me. The referee decides not the players. No respect for a referee nowadays unlike rugby. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
scotty
Joined: 12 Jul 2008 Posts: 9065 Location: Almost Dysart.
|
Posted: Fri Aug 25, 2023 6:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
I just want to see more cards for players who try to influence the ref in his decision. First time there's a foul and two or three run to the ref to complain, book em all!
Not saying he was biased but I thought the ref gave Hearts very little last night. _________________ Competitive goals: Vaughan 18, Easton 11, Hamilton 10, Smith 9, Stanton 7, Mullin 4, Connolly 3, O'Reilly 3, Rudden 3, S Brown 1, Dick 1, Gullan 1, Masson 1, Millen 1, Mitchell 1, Murray, Watson 1, OG's 1, |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Vinnie
Joined: 12 Jul 2008 Posts: 8227 Location: None Of Your Business
|
Posted: Fri Aug 25, 2023 6:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
Players that high 5/celebrate when their team mate wins a penalty crunches my gears along with everything else thats been highlighted _________________ THERES FIVE OF ME |
|
Back to top |
|
|
embow Moderator
Joined: 05 Jul 2008 Posts: 13026 Location: Lybster: O'er 'e Ord and far frae Fife
|
Posted: Fri Aug 25, 2023 9:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
The only things that you win in football (as far as I'm concerned) is the game and a tackle against the opponent. Anything else is awarded or decided by the officials with the ref having the final say.
Sorry Vinnie but it does my heid in when commentators and pundits witter on about so and so winning a penalty etc.
I do fully agree with you on the high five nonsense or the waving of an imaginary card of whatever colour in the face of the officials.
(Dives into bunker at this point with tin helmet on to escape the flak regarding winning penalties etc.🫣) _________________ Talk on! Talk on!
You'll never talk alone.
🥹🤜🤛 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Heilan Rover
Joined: 24 Dec 2018 Posts: 600 Location: Lorient
|
Posted: Fri Aug 25, 2023 9:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
wellyboot wrote: | It’s the claiming for fouls or throws when it clearly isn’t annoys me. The referee decides not the players. No respect for a referee nowadays unlike rugby. |
It used to be a law in Rugby that if an opposing player is not at least ten yards away from the ball when a player goes to kick an awarded free kick/penalty, then the ball is moved ten yards closer to that opposing player's goal, and the kick is taken from there. I'm not sure if this law still exists?? Maybe someone can enlighten me.
I do however think this would be a good rule to have in football, and would stop the delay in a free kick being taken and also the harassment of the referee. Imagine if the ball was only 9 yards away from the box and the opposition were not ten yards back. The ball would be moved into the box, therefore a penalty would be awarded. If this was introduced, it would stop the problem, almost overnight.
Will I bring Rolls for the Bunker lads? We could be there for sometime! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
WillieKirk
Joined: 08 Feb 2014 Posts: 1956 Location: Portobello
|
Posted: Fri Aug 25, 2023 10:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
Is that your Rolls or the bakers rolls?
But agree - too much harassment by players and officials and in some cases fans of the officials. But - I do like a wee moan at the linesman especially if he is from Aberdeenshire. _________________ Here Wee go again |
|
Back to top |
|
|
embow Moderator
Joined: 05 Jul 2008 Posts: 13026 Location: Lybster: O'er 'e Ord and far frae Fife
|
Posted: Fri Aug 25, 2023 10:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
I much prefer moaning at the one from Moray.
Somewhere from the dark side of Elgin, I've been informed 🤔
He's total DRoss!🫣 _________________ Talk on! Talk on!
You'll never talk alone.
🥹🤜🤛 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
TxRover
Joined: 02 Jun 2018 Posts: 3511 Location: North Texas, USA
|
Posted: Fri Aug 25, 2023 12:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The ugly reality is it will take time to correct course here…and there will be some outrageous decisions involved, if they move to fix this. The other reality is Scottish football COULD lead the world on this and get publicity/support.
First step:
1) Any and all players who approach a referee after a foul or restart is called/not called, other than the Team Captains and/or the player(s) involved, shall, without exception, receive a yellow card.
2) A retrospective review process will be established for all SPFL games. At a minimum, automatic cameras shall record the entire field of play and environs. Each team may submit up to five incidents during a match they wish reviewed. All submitted incidents, and any others the SFA/SPFL directs be reviewed, shall be reviewed during the two days following the match’s. The review teams shall consist of a senior referee (active or retired) named by the Referee Association, a retired player named by the player association, and a representative of the SFA/SPFL. Upon recommendation of action by two (or more) of the three reviewers, a second such team shall review the action and the recommendation to confirm it within one day. These teams shall be authorised to issue or revoke cards retrospectively for violations of the Laws of the Game. These teams shall also be authorised to recommend actions or fines to a Board created to oversee this process by the SFA/SPFL.
3) “Gamesmanship”; or delaying, advancing or impeding restarts shall be considered an infringement on the game and will be punished in the same vein (i.e. issuance of cards for adjudged persistent “gamesmanship” shall occur at the discretion of the referee). |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Heilan Rover
Joined: 24 Dec 2018 Posts: 600 Location: Lorient
|
Posted: Fri Aug 25, 2023 1:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
WillieKirk wrote: | Is that your Rolls or the bakers rolls?
But agree - too much harassment by players and officials and in some cases fans of the officials. But - I do like a wee moan at the linesman especially if he is from Aberdeenshire. |
Ach Willie. I have let slip the secret of my Lottery win and you have correctly sussed that Rolls, is indeed the name of my Butler.
I will of course sack him in the morning and replace him with someone who's name does not resemble a luxury car. How stupid of me to make such an elementary mistake. However, well spotted that man. Somebody take his name! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Cuparman
Joined: 12 Jul 2008 Posts: 1873 Location: Irvine
|
Posted: Fri Aug 25, 2023 1:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I agree with pretty much all of the your post Tx, however para 2 would be a non starter methinks purely on the total logistics involved.
I think most people agree that along with the social decline of standards and lack of punitive action against wrong doers it is also sadly reflected on the football pitch.
The SFA have to fully back up our football officials during these changing rules and players must be re- educated by attending a meeting from the Refs so that the players are fully walked through all the changes and re- enforce the need for the changes.
Old habits die hard as the saying goes.
And if showing cards is not working, the instigate plan B.............refs issued with “ cattle prods”.........they’ll get the message then. _________________ Born a Rover Live a Rover Die a Rover |
|
Back to top |
|
|
TxRover
Joined: 02 Jun 2018 Posts: 3511 Location: North Texas, USA
|
Posted: Fri Aug 25, 2023 4:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Cuparman wrote: | I agree with pretty much all of the your post Tx, however para 2 would be a non starter methinks purely on the total logistics involved. |
I agree in general, but it could be done, and I designed it to take a few years to really make a difference. By limiting each team to 5 occurrences per game to ask for review of, and not making the review team have to look at every incident, it will take time to bite…but as players start getting games off and such, over a few years, incidents will reduce and newer players will be used to the new standards. The speed of the review is vital, however.
Another idea to add, a player retrospectively assessed a yellow card will be treated as if they had that card already for the next match against the same opponent. You dive versus Falkirk and are assessed a retrospective yellow, if you get another yellow in the next match you play against Falkirk, it’s considered a second yellow of the match. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|